Social Psychological and Personality Science.
(Sage Publications)
First round of reviews.
Turnaround rate | 100 days (SD = 37) |
Review length | 775 words (SD = 179) |
Review quality | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
Overall quality | 3.3 / 5 (SD = 1.2) |
Would submit again | 3 / 5 (SD = 1.4) |
Journal recommendation | 3.3 / 5 (SD = 1.2) |
(based on 3 reports including 4 reviews) |
|
Desk rejects. |
|
Turnaround rate | 48 days (SD = 0) |
Plausibility | 2 / 5 (SD = 0) |
(based on 1 report) |
Reviewers & Editors (Initial Submissions)
Reviewers | |
Length | 775 words (SD = 179) |
Overall tone | Positive (modal) |
Knowledge | 4 / 5 (SD = 1) |
Helpfulness | 4.3 / 5 (SD = 0.8) |
Fairness | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
Overall quality | 4.5 / 5 (SD = 0.5) |
Editors | |
Length | 693 words (SD = 14) |
Decision | Reject (modal) |
Plausibility | 3 / 5 (SD = 1.6) |
Helpfulness | 3.3 / 5 (SD = 1.2) |
Fairness | 3.3 / 5 (SD = 1.2) |
Overall quality | 3.3 / 5 (SD = 1.2) |
Comments
· Overall quality rating: 5 / 5 · Recommendation: 5 / 5
Although the manuscript was rejected outright, the reviewers really did their job. They were informative, thoughtful, and made a lot of sense. They raised issues I had not thought about, which had to be addressed with future data and analyses. The editor-in-chief handled my manuscript and was kind and supportive in his remarks. This journal truly is shaping up to be a gem.
Although the manuscript was rejected outright, the reviewers really did their job. They were informative, thoughtful, and made a lot of sense. They raised issues I had not thought about, which had to be addressed with future data and analyses. The editor-in-chief handled my manuscript and was kind and supportive in his remarks. This journal truly is shaping up to be a gem.
Suggest Journal
Missing a journal in our database? Suggest adding it below!
Send Suggestion